Oil prices rose on Tuesday after the United States launched new airstrikes on Iran ahead of the reimposition of a naval blockade, while President Donald Trump abandoned his proposal to charge vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for US military protection.

US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude settled 1.5% higher at $79.34 per barrel, while global benchmark Brent crude climbed 1.72% to close at $84.73 per barrel.

In a post on social media, US Central Command (CENTCOM) said American forces had carried out fresh airstrikes against targets inside Iran as Washington prepared to reinstate a naval blockade on Iranian ports and coastal areas beginning at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

Meanwhile, Trump backed away from his plan to impose a 20% transit fee on cargo passing through the Strait of Hormuz under US military protection, saying Gulf countries would instead compensate the United States through increased investment in the American economy.

The president's reversal followed strong opposition from the global shipping industry, while the International Maritime Organization (IMO) said mandatory transit fees in the strait would violate international law.

Escalating Hormuz confrontation and attacks on oil tankers

Iran has sought for years to impose transit charges for safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz, but the United States has consistently opposed any such fees. Under the temporary agreement signed between Washington and Tehran on June 17, Iran agreed not to levy transit charges for a period of 60 days.

During the session, US crude briefly traded above $80 per barrel as the confrontation between the United States and Iran over control of the Strait of Hormuz continued.

CENTCOM said US forces struck targets along Iran's coastline on Monday night for a third consecutive night as part of operations aimed at degrading Tehran's ability to attack commercial shipping.

Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), meanwhile, said it had targeted two supertankers transiting the Strait of Hormuz after they switched off their identification systems.

Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) also reported that two of its tankers were hit by projectiles while passing through the strait, leaving one sailor dead and several others injured.

Ship-tracking companies reported a sharp decline in vessel traffic through the Strait of Hormuz since fighting resumed last week following Iranian attacks on several oil tankers.

Despite the hostilities, the US Department of Energy told CNBC that approximately 8.5 million barrels of oil passed through the Strait of Hormuz on Sunday.

Before the United States and Israel launched strikes against Iran on February 28, roughly one-fifth of global oil supplies flowed through the Strait of Hormuz. Shipping traffic fell sharply after Iran began targeting vessels in the waterway in early March, before gradually recovering following the temporary agreement reached between Washington and Tehran.

Venezuela's oil and gas industry has entered a new phase. Following sweeping reforms in the hydrocarbons sector and the geopolitical developments that emerged in early 2026, the central question is no longer whether the industry can be reopened to investment, but whether the country can deliver a genuine and sustainable recovery in production.

While Venezuela's vast oil resources have never been in doubt, the biggest challenge now lies in translating political momentum and regulatory reforms into lasting operational growth.

Rystad Energy expects Venezuela's crude oil production to rise by around 17%, or approximately 194,000 barrels per day, between the fourth quarter of 2025 and the fourth quarter of 2028. Most of that increase is expected to come from fields already in production rather than major new discoveries, highlighting that operational execution, rather than resource availability, will determine the pace of recovery.

Heavy and extra-heavy crude is expected to drive production growth over the coming years. Estimates suggest that around 75% of Venezuela's output through 2028 will come from heavy crude, extra-heavy crude, and bitumen, while the Orinoco Oil Belt will account for roughly 60% of total production.

Given this production mix, securing a reliable supply of diluents, carrying out well maintenance, drilling development wells, and managing mature fields will be more important than adding new reserves in the years ahead.

International oil companies to lead recovery, but cautiously

Rystad Energy expects international oil companies to contribute around two-thirds of the projected increase in Venezuela's production through 2028.

Chevron is expected to lead the recovery, followed by Repsol, Eni, Maha Energy, and Maurel & Prom.

Most of the growth is likely to come from expanding output at existing joint ventures, supported by renewed investment following regulatory reforms and sanctions relief, rather than from developing entirely new fields.

Chevron holds a particularly strategic position after portfolio changes increased its exposure to the Orinoco Oil Belt. Future production growth is expected to depend on improving the performance of existing fields, drilling development wells, and gradually advancing the Ayacucho 8 project.

At the same time, Eni and Repsol continue to play a central role in Venezuela's oil and natural gas sectors through assets including the Cardón IV block and the giant Perla gas field.

Despite the improvement in the investment environment, international participation remains selective, as companies balance the opportunities offered by Venezuela's vast resources against fiscal uncertainty, operational complexity, and long-term investment risks.

Operational execution, not resources, is the real challenge

Although government reforms have improved the industry's investment appeal, they have not eliminated the operational bottlenecks that have constrained production for years.

Sustainable production growth will require a reliable supply of diluents, a faster drilling pace, extensive well-maintenance programs, infrastructure upgrades, and a substantial increase in the number of active drilling rigs.

These requirements represent the critical link between Venezuela's enormous geological potential and actual production on the ground.

The competitiveness of the fiscal and tax framework also remains central to investment decisions. International oil companies have indicated that new capital commitments will depend on further improvements to the fiscal regime, particularly royalty and tax rates, to lower project development costs and improve economic returns.

The oilfield services sector stands out as the biggest obstacle to the industry's recovery. Venezuela's Oil Ministry has identified the need to operate 93 drilling rigs by 2028, requiring a significant increase from current levels.

Meeting that target will require a phased plan involving the reactivation of domestic drilling rigs, the refurbishment of idle equipment, and the eventual import of additional rigs from global markets.

This creates a major opportunity for drilling contractors and oilfield service providers, but it also illustrates the scale of the operational challenge. Companies must weigh equipment transportation costs, contract duration, and the risks associated with operating in Venezuela before committing new capital.

While local companies have already begun reactivating parts of their fleets, international firms remain more cautious, waiting for further evidence that recent reforms will create a stable operating environment capable of attracting long-term investment.

In this context, rebuilding operational capacity may become just as important as attracting investment into exploration and production.

The report said the 2026 Hydrocarbons Law represents one of the most significant structural reforms to Venezuela's oil industry in decades, expanding opportunities for private-sector participation and providing greater flexibility within the fiscal framework.

However, legislative reforms alone will not be enough to restore production. Venezuela's ability to achieve sustainable growth will depend on the speed of implementation, the stability of fiscal policy, continued sanctions relief, and the industry's ability to rebuild its operational infrastructure.

The report concluded that the future of Venezuela's oil sector will be determined less by the size of its vast reserves than by its ability to execute drilling plans, upgrade infrastructure, strengthen oilfield services, and provide a stable investment environment. Those factors will ultimately shape the country's production trajectory through the remainder of the decade.

Wall Street's major indexes advanced on Tuesday after weaker-than-expected US inflation data boosted hopes that the Federal Reserve may adopt a less hawkish stance on interest rates. Strong quarterly earnings from major US banks also provided additional support as the second-quarter earnings season got underway.

US consumer prices rose 3.5% year-over-year in June, below the 3.8% increase expected by economists surveyed by Reuters.

Following the data release, traders sharply reduced their expectations for near-term monetary tightening, with the probability of a 25-basis-point rate hike at the Federal Reserve's next meeting falling to 15% from 35% before the report.

Skyler Weinand, Chief Investment Officer at Regan Capital, said the data suggests that the inflation surge fueled by the conflict with Iran is beginning to ease. However, he cautioned that the improvement could prove temporary given the renewed escalation in recent days.

He added that softer inflation is likely to encourage the Federal Reserve to leave interest rates unchanged for now and reduce the likelihood of another rate hike. Nevertheless, he noted that Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh has maintained a consistently hawkish tone since taking office.

In his prepared testimony before Congress, the first of two hearings this week, Warsh reaffirmed that returning inflation to the Federal Reserve's 2% target remains his top priority.

Strong bank earnings offset sharp IBM selloff

Corporate earnings took center stage as the second-quarter reporting season began.

IBM shares tumbled about 24% after the software and consulting company issued second-quarter revenue guidance that fell short of market expectations. If the stock closes down more than 22.9%, it would mark its largest one-day decline since the 1987 Black Monday crash.

The weakness spread across the software sector, with Oracle falling 1.7%, ServiceNow losing 5.6%, and Accenture declining 2.8%.

Meanwhile, strong earnings from major US banks helped lift the broader market. Goldman Sachs surged 6.5% after posting second-quarter earnings that beat analysts' estimates, supported by a rebound in dealmaking activity and heightened market volatility stemming from the Middle East conflict, which drove equity trading revenue to a record high.

JPMorgan Chase gained 1.8%, while Citigroup rose 1.5% after both banks reported higher second-quarter profits.

Bank of America added 1.4% after reporting earnings above expectations, while Wells Fargo slipped 0.3%.

The S&P 500 financial sector rose 0.3%, while nine of the index's eleven sectors traded higher.

Investors are closely watching corporate earnings for early signs of the strength of the US economy during what could prove to be a pivotal earnings season for extending the rally that has lifted the S&P 500 roughly 10% since the start of the year.

As of 9:52 a.m. ET, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 76.77 points, or 0.16%, at 52,580.94. The S&P 500 gained 23.46 points, or 0.32%, to 7,539.07, while the Nasdaq Composite advanced 155.24 points, or 0.60%, to 26,028.42.

The Nasdaq recovered part of Monday's 1.6% decline, while semiconductor stocks stabilized after heavy losses in the previous session, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX) rising 3.1%.

Geopolitical tensions remained firmly on investors' radar after the United States and Iran exchanged attacks in the Gulf, pushing oil futures to their highest levels in four weeks.

Market breadth was positive, with advancing stocks outnumbering decliners by a ratio of 2.31-to-1 on the New York Stock Exchange and 1.61-to-1 on the Nasdaq.

Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh told members of Congress on Tuesday that the US central bank remains fully committed to restoring price stability, stressing that the Federal Reserve will continue to operate within its statutory mandate and will not become involved in political matters. He also pledged greater transparency regarding the work of the Fed's internal task forces.

Warsh said interest rates and the balance sheet will remain the Federal Reserve's primary monetary policy tools, emphasizing that the balance sheet is an integral part of monetary policy rather than merely an operational instrument. He added that the responsibilities of several task forces, including those focused on the balance sheet and communications, will overlap, but stressed that their work will not be conducted behind closed doors. Their findings will be shared regularly with members of Congress through the end of the year.

The Fed chair also welcomed the central bank's decision to abandon its flexible inflation-targeting framework, arguing that allowing inflation to overshoot its target ultimately resulted in much stronger price pressures than policymakers had anticipated. He reiterated that the Federal Reserve is "capable of restoring price stability, and it will do so."

Warsh said the US economy remains strong and financial markets are functioning well, although he acknowledged that conditions in the housing sector appear more uneven. He noted that mortgage rates are now higher than in previous years, partly because inflation remains above the Federal Reserve's 2% target. However, he avoided describing current mortgage rates as excessively high, saying only that they are above earlier levels.

On the labor market, Warsh said conditions remain broadly stable, with job creation keeping pace with labor force growth. He added that the unemployment rate has remained low and largely unchanged over the past year, while layoffs have continued to decline.

The Federal Reserve chair declined to comment on questions related to the US president and the independence of regulatory agencies. He also refused to express an opinion on whether the president or other executive branch officials should be allowed to own companies or assets in industries they oversee as regulators.